The Birth of the Federal Reserve
During the early 1900s, the United States experienced several financial panics that caused widespread distress. One of the worst occurred in 1906, prompting the government to take action. In 1913, they passed the Federal Reserve Act to mitigate the impact of these crises and prevent them from happening again.
Before the Act, banks kept their reserve funds (kind of like an emergency fund) at large banks in New York, known as Wall Street banks. The issue was that during financial panics, larger banks could block smaller banks’ access to their own funds.
It had been reported that Wall Street banks occasionally used reserve funds for speculative purposes, including betting on the stock market.
When these bets failed to yield positive results (as often happened), they led to further financial difficulties. Officials believed this type of speculative gambling played a significant role in causing economic recessions and deflation.
Tip: Use the audio button to listen to this article!
The Act established 12 Federal Reserve Banks across the nation to serve as a secure storage location for the reserves of smaller banks. The intention behind this arrangement was to guarantee that smaller banks could access their funds at all times, even in a panic. Additionally, this system was implemented to prevent Wall Street Banks from utilizing reserves for hazardous speculation.
Now, let’s continue with the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Elastic currency
The idea was also to create an “elastic currency,” which means the money supply could stretch or shrink based on the needs of businesses. For example, when it’s harvest season, and farmers sell their crops, there’s a higher need for cash. With an elastic currency, they could get this cash quickly.
This wasn’t implemented as prescribed here, but the Federal Reserve developed a tool to control the money supply.
The Federal Reserve controls the economy by changing the interest rate for banks, buying or selling government securities, and regulating the money banks have to keep on hand.
For example, when the economy slows, the Fed might lower interest rates, encouraging banks to lend more and businesses and consumers to borrow more.
One way to stimulate economic activity is by increasing the money supply. However, when the economy is overheating and inflation becomes a concern, the Fed can adjust by raising interest rates. This makes borrowing more expensive and slows down the expansion of the money supply.
This ability to adjust the money supply as needed in response to economic conditions is what the term “elastic currency” means. It’s an essential tool used by the Fed and other central banks worldwide to help manage their economies.
Real bills
Also, the Federal Reserve Banks were set to base their credit on “real bills,” short-term self-liquidating commercial paper. These are basically short-term loans guaranteed to be paid back because they’re tied to real goods, like crops or manufactured products.
This meant that the Fed would only lend money against “real bills” of goods, i.e., actual goods being produced or sold. This way, it was believed, the amount of credit in the economy would naturally expand and contract with the needs of commerce, helping to prevent inflation or deflation.
The purpose of implementing this system was to enhance the stability and reliability of the money flow in the economy. The ultimate goal was to eradicate speculative betting, which was believed to cause recessions and deflation and prevent further panics.
The real bills doctrine was good in theory but difficult to use in practice. It was hard to know what counted as a “real bill.” Following this doctrine too closely could also limit the central bank’s ability to solve bigger economic problems.
Because of these erroneous ideas, the Federal Reserve System became a source of recurring, massive instability in the pre-World War II era.
The Federal Reserve and other central banks moved away from the real bills doctrine as time passed. They adopted other monetary policy tools, including open market operations, adjustments to the discount rate, and setting reserve requirements.
These tools give central banks greater flexibility in managing the money supply and responding to shifts in economic circumstances.
Origins of the Federal Reserve: The Debate Between Populists and Financial Elites
Back in the day, financial panics were a regular thing. They’d start because banks got spooked and yanked back all their loans quickly, like pulling the rug out from under the economy. It led to cities going bust, citizens going broke, and a general mood of doom and gloom.
In the early 20th century, President Woodrow Wilson and others decided they had had enough of these financial rollercoasters. They proposed creating a central bank as a safety net for the economy.
The idea behind establishing the Federal Reserve was to create a system to regulate the circulation of money, avert economic crises, and maintain a stable financial environment.
There was significant resistance to the proposal. Populists were wary of a centralized banking system. They expressed concern that New York would have undue control over the nation's finances. However, Wilson alleviated their fears by assuring them that the Federal Reserve would comprise a network of regional banks nationwide rather than a single central bank in New York.
One of the big players in this debate was William Jennings Bryan. He was a politician from Nebraska who had fought against the power of big banks throughout his career. Even though he later said he regretted it, Bryan got on board with the Federal Reserve Act.
William Jennings Bryan, a Nebraska politician known for opposing big banks, became well-known during the debate. Although he later regretted it, he supported the Federal Reserve Act at the time.
During Bryan’s time, farmers struggled as prices fell, but their debts remained the same. They thought big financial companies were mistreating them. Bryan brought them together and suggested a new money system that used silver instead of gold. He thought this would help with deflation and be suitable for borrowers.
Unfortunately for Bryan, Bryan faced disappointment as he lost the presidential election in 1896, and his proposal for a silver-based currency failed to gain popularity. The populist movement lost momentum but saw a resurgence in the 1920s when deflation became a major issue. Their new focus was on creating money out of thin air, or “printing press money,” as it was called. This worried many people, especially those with conservative beliefs, who feared it could lead to runaway inflation.
Fast forward to the Great Depression, and there was still this big divide between populists, who wanted to print more money to stimulate the economy, and the financial elites, who wanted to stick with the gold standard.
The conflict made it challenging for policymakers to recognize that the Federal Reserve had already established a system where money was effectively generated out of nothing, despite the continued use of gold in theory.
The Push for an “Elastic Currency” After the 1907 Banking Panic
After the banking panic of 1907, there was a major push to reform the banking system. Everyone agreed that the U.S. needed an “elastic currency.”
You see, during the Civil War, the North created national banks with the power to print banknotes. However, there was a catch. These banknotes had to be backed by Treasury bonds.
This meant that banks couldn’t print more money during peak periods, such as harvesting season or banking panics, when extra cash might have helped.
Enter stage: the Aldrich-Vreeland Act of 1908
This Act created the National Monetary Commission. The head was Nelson Aldrich, a big-shot Senator from Rhode Island. Aldrich drafted a bill proposing the creation of a National Reserve Association. An organization in Washington and 15 regional branches that would help local banks in times of need.
Some people thought the National Reserve Association was like a central bank. The Democrats were worried it could give too much power to a few people and create a “money trust.”
Even though the Democrats weren’t fans of the Aldrich bill, it ultimately served as the basis for the Federal Reserve Act. This Act established the Federal Reserve, the U.S. central bank we know today. The Commission argued that this new system, with its regional branches, would prevent too much money from flowing into New York and causing risky speculation.
Even though the Democrats weren’t fans of the Aldrich bill, it ultimately served as the basis for the Federal Reserve Act. This Act established the Federal Reserve, the U.S. central bank we know today. The Commission argued that this new system, with its regional branches, would prevent too much money from flowing into New York and causing risky speculation.
Fast forward to 1912. Woodrow Wilson worked hard to pass the Federal Reserve Act. The goal was to prevent a small group of people from controlling the country’s money and to make it easier to adjust the money supply to fit the economy's needs.
The Federal Reserve Act “unintentionally” gave a central bank the power to make and get rid of money. This wasn’t what was “planned.”
However, the Federal Reserve has been “important” in stabilizing the U.S. economy, even though it was initially a “mistake.”
The Federal Reserve’s Real Bills System
So the Federal Reserve was originally set up to manage banking within its districts, kind of like your local mayor running the town. They used “real bills,” essentially loans that pay for themselves when the borrowers sell their goods or services.
Think of it like using a credit card to buy inventory for your online store. You borrow money to buy the goods, and then as you sell them, you pay back the loan.
In the old days, banks could only make money if they had government bonds to back them up, but the amount was fixed. So, the money supply couldn’t adjust to the economy's changing needs. Some believed this led to reckless financial behavior and big economic swings.
The “real bills” were supposed to solve this problem. Banks would give out loans based on what businesses genuinely needed to produce and sell goods. Since these loans paid for themselves, the money would return to the system once the goods were sold. It’s like ensuring you always refill the fridge with soda once it’s empty, avoiding having too much or too little to drink.
Paul Warburg, who played a big role in creating the Federal Reserve System, said it’s important for the amount of money available to change, like a rubber band that stretches and contracts. This helps prevent sudden price increases that can make things very expensive.
Carter Glass helped create the Federal Reserve. He thought the old financial system was ineffective because it didn’t adjust to changes in demand. When there was too much money, people would use it for risky things such as speculation, which made the economy unstable.
Early thinkers needed to understand how the economy works. They thought that people’s emotions caused big changes in the economy. But modern economics, which emerged after World War II, holds that prices are the main force driving the economy.
During the Great Depression, Eugene Meyer, a former governor of the Federal Reserve Board, emphasized the importance of credit quality instead of just quantity. He recognized that economic changes could result from excessive optimism or pessimism. He believed the banking system should help reduce these ups and downs, similar to shock absorbers on a bumpy road.
Gold Standard
The U.S. used to have a “gold standard” where each dollar was backed by gold. This limited banks' revenue because it had to match the country’s gold Reserve.
The responsibility of maintaining the system was given to the Federal Reserve, which was tasked with adjusting interest rates to ensure that the value of the dollar remained linked to gold.
This was done, for example, by raising interest rates when gold reserves were low. However, they didn’t strictly follow this system.
Instead, the Federal Reserve was more concerned with preventing “speculative excess,” a situation in which too much money is poured into risky ventures, creating a bubble that eventually bursts and leads to a recession.
Fast forward to the 1920s, when the U.S. received a large amount of gold from other countries, leading to a substantial increase in its gold reserves. Theoretically, the Federal Reserve should have reduced its interest rates to align with the rise in gold, but the Fed didn’t follow this plan.
After Britain stopped using the gold standard in 1931, many people thought the U.S. would do the same.
So many exchanged their dollars for gold. The Fed stopped this by increasing interest rates, so people wouldn’t want to exchange their money.
Throughout its history, the Federal Reserve had the mindset of adhering to the “gold standard,” viewing its gold reserves as a limited asset. However, establishing the Federal Reserve meant that the United States had shifted towards a fiat system, in which the Reserve could create money as needed.
The Federal Reserve was caught in a dilemma between its traditional approach of adhering to the “gold standard” and the contemporary reality of a fiat money system.
While the gold standard was straightforward and unambiguous, the fiat system demanded greater intricacy and comprehension. The Fed’s reluctance to fully accept and understand this new system contributed to frequent economic downturns.
Looking for more educational content?
Subscribe to newsletter: https://romanornr.io
Also, follow this link: https://linktr.ee/romanornr
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/RNR_0
More medium articles?
If you are looking for more medium articles like this written by me, you can find them here.
Follow me on medium: https://romanornr.medium.com/membership
If you enjoyed your experience, leave a clap or comment.
Other medium articles you may like:
